E-ISSN:2349-4166
P-ISSN:2349-4158

Research Article

Postpartum

Public Health Review - International Journal of Public Health Research

2017 Volume 4 Number 5 October-December
Publisherwww.medresearch.in

Intergenerational patterns of contraception use during extended postpartum period among women in Haryana, India

Gupta P.1*
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17511/ijphr.2017.i5.04

1* Pallavi Gupta, Research Scholar, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Background and Objectives: Present study is an attempt to examine the generational patterns of adoption of family planning during extended postpartum period before and after adjusting for individual, household and contextual factors. The study was further extended by analysing timing and type of contraceptive methods used by generations. Methods: Primary survey data from Rohtak district of Haryana, India, was used, in which two successive generations were interviewed regarding family planning and contraception use. Results: Findings demonstrated the different patterns of family planning use across the generations after adjusting for other potential covariates. The early initiation of use of family planning and use of modern methods during postpartum period was higher among younger women. Conclusions: Though, by time and generations there has been a significant change in the extent and patterns of contraceptive adoption among postpartum women, still in few segments, younger generation women reported low use of family planning which calls for urgent policy attention.

Keywords: Intergenerational, Contraception, Postpartum period, Family Planning Methods

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Pallavi Gupta, Research Scholar, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Email:
Gupta P, Intergenerational patterns of contraception use during extended postpartum period among women in Haryana, India. Public Health Rev Int J Public Health Res. 2017;4(5):125-133.
Available From
https://publichealth.medresearch.in/index.php/ijphr/article/view/72

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2017-11-20 2017-11-30 2017-12-09 2017-12-15
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
No Nil Yes 4%

© 2017 by Pallavi Gupta and Published by Siddharth Health Research and Social Welfare Society. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Background

Extended postpartum period has been defined as the 12-month interval after a child birth. Biologically, the postpartum period rests upon the return of menstruation after birth. It also depends on the intensity and length of breastfeeding [1]. The dynamics of contraceptive use among women in extended postpartum period (12 months after the childbirth) is of interest of the family planning programs and policies in order to ensure that all birth are properly timed, properly spaced and ended by choice.

Moreover, focusing on contraception use during the postpartum period is particularly important for the health and survival of mother as well as child as closely spaced child births pose health risk to new born and mothers [2]. Researchers also evidenced that the chances of infant survival are about two times higher among those who born after the birth interval of three to five months [3, 4].

Also, women with less than 6 months pregnancy intervals are at higher risk of pregnancy complications, premature rupture, or even maternal death [5]. Therefore, efforts to address the agenda of individual wellbeing in reproductive health seek to understand the specific patterns and determinants of contraceptive use in the postpartum period.

Though, adoption of contraceptive methods for spacing between children in India has been increased, still it remains low among women. The largest proportion of women in the country experiences unmet need for contraception in their first year after childbirth [6].

Several studies in the Indian context have documented that contraceptive use during postpartum period among women have been influenced by complex interactions between micro level factors such as age, education, media exposure as well as macro level factors such as improvements in health services, urbanization [7,8,9,10].

Though, women’s age has been highlighted as an important determinant of family planning use for spacing between children by the researchers, however, the causal approach towards the age effect while studying the use of contraceptives after a child birth has persisted in the majority of the studies.

In India, none of the available studies have focused to examine the intergenerational patterns of contraceptive use among women during the postpartum period. This study is important in the sense that Indian society is in transformation and experiencing the generation gap. Because of the socialization, the older generation demonstrates unsupportive attitude towards contraception use and prefer less use of family planning.

On the contrast, the younger generation who tend to bring new rules of behaviour and alter the social structure in order to fulfil their social and economic needs. The changes in the socioeconomic environment along with life experiences of individuals can lead to inter-generational differences.

With this background, present study is an attempt to understand the patterns of contraceptive use among women during the extended postpartum period across the two successive generations.

Precisely the study examined the generational differentials in adoption of family planning methods during extended postpartum period based on the hypothesis that individuals born at different time periods experience different socio-economic circumstances. The study was further extended by analysing timing and type of contraceptive methods used by generations.

Materials and Methods

Study Area: Considering the need of the study, primary survey conducted in Rohtak district of Haryana, India, in which two successive generations were interviewed, was used. Rohtak district is one of the 21 districts of Haryana state in northern India. It is located in the southeast of Haryana and northwest of Delhi, bounded by other districts of Haryana such as Jind and Sonipat to the north, Jhajjar to the east and Bhiwani, Hisar and Sirsa to the west. Rohtak city is the district headquarters.

Sample selection and inclusion criteria: Using multi-stage stratified random sampling, a total of 800 ever-married women having at least one child (400 from each generation) residing in same house, were interviewed regarding family planning, contraception use and reproductive history, as a part of Ph.D. program. As, data was collected from women residing under one roof, mothers-in-law were treated as older generation and daughters-in-law were treated as younger generation and analyses have been performed accordingly.


We preferred to interview mothers-in-law (older generation) aged less than equal to 65 years in order to reduce the recall bias.

Data collection: It was done during May-August, 2013 using both qualitative and quantitative techniques data collection.

Variables used in the study: For postpartum period, the study focused on the 12 months experience of women after the first childbirth across the generations. The outcome of interest was the use of any family planning methods after first childbirth of women across the generations. Use of any family planning methods were further classified as modern and traditional contraceptive methods (0-not used; 1-used traditional methods; 2-used modern methods). The outcome was measured in duration (in months) from the time of childbirth to the time when women started using any contraceptive methods.

Other important demographic and socio-economic predictors included in the analysis were women’s age, age at marriage (<18 years, 18-20 years, >20 years), educational status (0-Not educated, 1-primary & secondary education, 2-higher secondary or more), occupational status (0-not working, 1-working), family planning awareness (0-no, 1-yes), autonomy (0-low, 1-high) etc.

For measuring women’s autonomy index, a set of variables namely, women’s mobility (freedom to visit outside home unescorted), decision making authority and access to economic resources were taken into account. At household level, ethnicity-castes (Scheduled castes, Other Backward Classes, Others), economic status (low, medium, high) of household were considered as potential variables. Economic status of household was calculated from the set of assets owned by household including ownership of consumer items and dwelling characteristics.

Statistical techniques- The study employed bivariate and multivariate statistical techniques to fulfil the proposed objectives. Principal component analysis was applied to compute autonomy index and household economic status. Discriminant analysis was used to determine the factors contributing most in defining the differences across the generations. Further, binary logistic regression analysis was utilized as per the requirement of the study. All the analysis was conducted using statistical software STATA 13.0 [11].

Results

Profile of the respondents: Table 1 presents the profile of the respondents interviewed in the survey. The mean age of older generation women in the sample was 54.7 years and mean age at marriage was 17.1 years. Among younger generation women, mean age was 25.6 years and mean age at marriage was 22.3 years. A little less than half (47%) of older generation women were illiterate and around 29% of them had primary & secondary education.

Only 24% women of older generation had attained higher secondary education or above. On the other hand, majority (65%) of younger generation women had attained higher education or above and rest 35% had primary or secondary education. Close to half (49%) of women from younger generation were not involved in any income generating activity while 68% among older generation were engaged in household work only.

Awareness about family planning was higher (72%) among women of younger generation while those not aware about family planning methods had the majority (64%) in older generation. Around 60% younger generation women reported to had low autonomy compared with 49% of older generation women. This may be because of family structure as in vertically joint family younger women as daughter-in-law usually live under the control of elder women, especially mother-in-law.

Table-1: Percentage distribution of older and younger generation women having at least two children

Characteristics of respondents Older generation Younger generation
(%) n (%) N
Individual characteristics
Mean age of respondents 54.7 400 25.6 400
Mean age at marriage 17.1 400 22.3 400
Educational Status
No education 47.2 189 0.0 0
Primary & Secondary education 29.2 117 35.4 142
Higher secondary & above 23.6 94 64.6 258
Occupational Status
Engaged in household work only 68.2 273 49.1 196
Involved in income generating activity 31.8 127 50.9 204
Aware about FP methods
No 64.2 257 28.3 113

Yes 35.8 143 71.7 287
Autonomy level
Low 48.8 195 59.7 219
High 51.2 205 40.3 181
Household level characteristics
Castes
Scheduled castes 36.3 145 36.3 145
Other Backward Classes 32.7 131 32.7 131
Others 31.0 124 31.0 124
Economic status of household
Poor 30.2 121 30.2 121
Middle 43.1 172 43.1 172
Rich 26.7 107 26.7 107
Total 400 400

Women from middle status households (based on the wealth status index) were majority (43%) in the sample and those from poor households accounted for 30%. Furthermore, there were 36% women belonged to Scheduled castes (SC), 33% from Other Backward Classes (OBC) and remaining 31% from other castes.

Intergenerational differentials in use of family planning methods during extended postpartum period have been shown in Table 2. Findings show that adoption of any family planning methods during the extended postpartum period was more among younger generation women compared to older ones.

More than half (59%) of older generation women did not use any family planning during the postpartum period while, about 37% women from younger generation did not adopt any family planning methods.

The extent of use of family planning methods during the extended postpartum period were also varied by demographic and socio-economic characteristics of women across the generations. By educational status, majority of respondents of both the generations with higher education used family planning in comparison to those with no or lesser education.

Likewise, the adoption of family planning in extended postpartum period was more among respondents working outside the home, have a regular media exposure, belonged to high wealth quintile. Besides the similar pattern of family planning use, differences also occur in usage of family planning across the generations. For all socioeconomic characteristics, utilization of family planning has increased among the younger generation.

For instance, the adoption of family planning methods in extended postpartum period among highly educated women increased from 54% for older generation to 67% for younger generation. Also, across the generations, the use of family planning during postpartum period was increased from 53% to 67% among working women.

There were 48% older women who were aware about family planning used contraceptives in extended postpartum period while this proportion was 70% among younger generation. Among caste categories, the highest change in utilization of family planning methods during extended postpartum period was observed among women belonged to non-scheduled castes or non-backward class social groups.

Results from discriminant analysis also revealed education (Discriminant loading-0.836), occupation (Discriminant loading-0.525) and awareness about family planning (Discriminant loading-0.761), that distinguish the generations by their use of family planning in extended postpartum period.

Additionally, economic status of the household also contributes for the significant differences in family planning use among women in extended postpartum period (Discriminant loading-0.794).

Table-2: Intergenerational differentials in using family planning during extended post-partum period by socioeconomic characteristics

Characteristics Older generation Younger generation
(%) n (%) N
Individual level
Age at marriage DL=0.217
Less than 18 years 36.8 90 53.0 46
18-20 years 41.5 49 59.5 79
21 years or more 61.8 23 70.4 127
Educational Status DL=0.836
No education 33.4 63 0.0 0
Primary & Secondary education 41.1 48 55.1 78
Higher secondary & above 54.0 51 67.3 174
Occupational Status DL=0.525
Engaged in household work only 34.8 95 59.1 116
Involved in income generating activity 52.7 67 66.8 136
Aware about FP methods DL=0.761
No 36.6 94 44.2 50
Yes 47.5 68 70.4 202

Autonomy DL=0.178
Low 33.8 66 54.4 119
High 46.9 96 73.4 133
Household level characteristics
Castes DL=0.069
Scheduled castes 32.4 47 54.4 79
Other Backward Classes 38.2 50 67.3 88
Others 52.4 65 68.5 85
Economic status of household DL=0.794
Low 25.7 31 53.0 64
Medium 39.4 68 62.1 107
High 59.0 63 75.8 81
Total 40.5 162 63.0 252

Note: DL-Discriminant loadings; 0.5 was considered as the cut-off between important and less important predictors and important predictors defining contraception use among women during postpartum period across the generations are shown in bold and italics.

Table 3 presents the effects of generations on adoption of family planning use in extended post-partum period among women. Model-I presents the baseline effect of generations on family planning use. In model-I, women in the younger generation were 1.63 times more likely to use contraceptive methods during extended post-partum period than women of older generation.

After controlling for prenatal care and delivery services in model-II, results show that the odds of using family planning methods slightly increased for younger generation (OR-1.68; p<0.01). In model-II, the odds of using contraception in extended postpartum period increased with an increase in prenatal care visits. Further, the odds of family planning use after the child birth for women who received advice for family planning was higher (OR-1.82; p<0.01) compared to those who did not receive any advice during antenatal visits.

Place of delivery also significantly influence the postpartum contraceptive use among women. Women who delivered their child in any private facility were two times more likely to adopt contraceptives after child birth (OR-2.26; p<0.05). Women who delivered in government facility also had higher odds as compared with those who had home delivery.

In model-III, the generational effect on family planning use was remained similar after including i.e. younger generation were more likely to adopt contraception during postpartum period in comparison with older generation women.

Nevertheless, prenatal care services, family planning advice and place of delivery were still significant though their effects were attenuated. When compared with women with no education, the odds of using contraceptives during extended postpartum period were higher among those who attained primary or secondary education (OR-1.90; p<0.05). Further, women who were highly educated were two times more likely to adopt contraception after child birth (OR-2.67; p<0.01). Women who were involved in any income generating activity were also more likely to use contraception within 12 months after child birth. By caste status, uptake of family planning methods was lower among women from scheduled castes (SC) and other backward classes (OBC). Belonging to households categorized as middle income was associated with 29 percent likelihood of using contraception during extended postpartum period whereas belonging to rich households had odds 1.98.

Table-3: Adjusted odds for using family planning among older and younger generation women during extended post-partum period

Characteristics Model-I Model-II Model-III
Generations
Older generation (Ref.) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Younger generation 1.63*(1.22-1.94) 1.68*(1.37-1.80) 1.42**(1.29-2.04)
Prenatal care visits©   1.76**(1.52-1.96) 1.43**(1.21-1.66)
Received FP advice
No (Ref.)   1.00 1.00
Yes   1.82*(1.49-2.04) 1.39**(1.36-1.76)
Delivery Location
Home   1.00 1.00
Government facility   1.68*(1.51-1.88) 1.21(0.66-1.53)
Private health care facility   2.26**(1.94-2.62) 1.37**(1.08-1.74)
Educational Status
No education (Ref.)     1.00
Primary & Secondary education     1.90**(1.72-2.31)
Higher secondary & above     2.67*(2.44-2.92)
Occupational Status      
Not working (Ref.)     1.00
Working     1.24**(1.19-1.52)

Aware about FP methods
No (Ref.)     1.00
Yes     1.12(0.48-1.47)
Autonomy
Low (Ref.)     1.00
High     1.42*(1.29-1.57)
Castes
Others (Ref.)     1.00
Scheduled castes     0.68**(0.52-0.82)
Other Backward Classes     0.88*(0.82-0.96)
Economic status of household
Low (Ref.)     1.00
Medium     1.29**(1.15-1.44)
High     1.98**(1.74-2.36)
Log Likelihood -4252.74 -4140.27 -3839.91
Prob.>Chi square 0.000 0.000 0.000

Note: First category of each variable was considered as reference category; ©-Continuous variable; *-1% level of significance; **-5% level of significance; ***-10% level of significance;

The differentials in uptake of family planning methods after the child birth across the generation have been depicted in Graph 1. Findings state that among those who used family planning during extended postpartum period, majority (43%) of younger generation women adopted contraceptive methods within 3 months after child birth, while only 11% women of older generation used any contraception during this period.

Majority (41%) of older generation women started using contraceptive methods after 7-9 months of child birth. Also, there were 20% and 28% older women who used any contraceptive methods after 4-6 months and 10-12 months respectively.

Graph-1: Uptake of family planning across the generations by time (in months) after child birth

public_72_01.jpg

Significant differences in type of contraceptive methods opted during extended postpartum period across the generations were also observed.

A small proportion (29%) of older generation women relied on modern contraceptive methods during postpartum period. Around 37% of them used withdrawal methods followed by abstinence (34%) after the child birth. Among younger generation almost all women adopted modern methods of contraception such as condoms (32%), IUD’s (Copper-T; 22%) during their postpartum period. The utilization of oral pills was found low (16%) among younger women in postpartum period (Graph 2).

Graph-2: Type of contraceptive methods used during extended post-partum period across the generations

public_72_02.jpg

Interestingly, the study also point out a shift from traditional methods to modern methods among older generation women. Around 37% older generation women initially adopted traditional methods of contraception and later took up modern methods during their postpartum period. Majority (61%) younger generation women initially adopted modern methods during postpartum period and a lesser proportion (17%) of them shows the shift from traditional to modern methods during postpartum period.

Table-4: Percent distribution of older and younger generation women reported shift in use contraceptive methods, what they adopted initially after child birth

Shift in contraceptive methods Older generation Younger generation
Used modern methods only 23.6 60.7
Used traditional methods only 24.5 19.0
Yes, from traditional to modern methods 37.4 16.7
Yes, modern to traditional methods 14.5 3.6

Discussion and Conclusions: The findings of the study revealed significant differences across the generations in contraception use during postpartum


period. Across the generations, postpartum contraception use was lower among older generation women. Contraception use during postpartum period was about 63% among younger generation women, while less than half (41%) of the older generation women used any contraceptives within 12 months after child birth.

Among women of both the generations, uptake of family planning methods in postpartum period was lower among illiterate & less educated and non-working women, those who had no knowledge about family planning and less autonomy, those belong to scheduled castes/tribes and poor households. Further, the study demonstrated that different patterns of contraceptive use among women across the generations, was also observed before and after adjusting for other potential covariates.

The transformation of societies in terms of increased access to education, awareness about family planning methods via advertisements, internet, infrastructure and accessibility of resources explains the differences in the behaviour of women across the generations.

Though, compared with older generation, uptake of family planning methods has been increased among younger women, still, a substantial proportion did not use any contraceptives during extended postpartum period. Up to some extent, it could be linked with the lack of adequate knowledge and awareness about family planning.

Also, influence of husband or other family members may also be associated with the women’s decision to use contraceptives soon after child birth as all the younger women in the study were residing in joint family or with mother-in-law at the time of interview.

Previous studies also highlighted the dominant influence of husband’s views & decisions over women’s reproductive behaviour [12, 13, 14]. Moreover, in typical patriarchal joint kinship structure (most common family structure in Indian society), older women especially mother-in-law control their roles, responsibilities and even their reproductive decisions [15, 16].

In addition, timing of contraceptive use across the generations was also examined here. The early initiation of use of family planning and use of modern methods during the postpartum period was higher among younger generation women compared to older generation.

It is also important to note that adoption of traditional contraceptive methods in extended postpartum period has been reduced significantly from older generation to younger generation. Modern contraceptive methods were more among younger generation women and condoms followed by copper-T were the most popular method used by younger women during extended postpartum period.

The findings also demonstrate low use of oral contraceptive pills in the postpartum period among women of younger generation. It may be argued here that during postpartum period majority of women breastfeed their child and probably because of the side effects of oral pills on quantity of breast milk and baby, they did not preferred to use oral contraceptive pills.

Though, by time and generations there has been a significant change in the extent and patterns of contraceptive adoption among postpartum women, still in few segments, women in present generation also reported low use of family planning during postpartum period especially among those belonged to low socioeconomic profile, which calls for urgent policy attention.

Researchers also argued that younger generation women still face challenges in accessing reproductive health services as long as the level of stigma remains high in society. Thus, family planning programmes should be designed keeping in mind the socioeconomic characteristics of younger generation women in order to reach the most unobserved women. Also, service providers should tend to focus their counselling on spacing methods to young couples. The study had few limitations also. The surveyed data was self-reported and in an attempt of identifying the patterns of family planning use across the generations, both the generations were asked retrospectively about their reproductive history and family planning use, which introduces recall and social desirability biases.

Key Messages

  • By time and generations there has been a significant change in the extent and patterns of contraceptive adoption among postpartum women, still in few segments, women in present generation also reported low use of family planning during postpartum period especially among those belonged to low socioeconomic profile.

  • The low use of contraception during extended post-partum period among younger generation could be linked with the lack of adequate knowledge and awareness about family planning.
  • Influence of husband or other family members may also be associated with the women’s decision to use contraceptives soon after child birth.

Reference

  1. Kennedy K, Trussell J. Postpartum contraception and lactation, In- Hatcher RA, et al; Contraceptive Technology. 18th revised ed, Ardent Media Inc- New York. 2004;575-600.
  2. -
  3. Sebastian MP, Khan ME, Kumari K, Idani R. Increasing postpartum contraception in rural India- Evaluation of a community based behaviour change communication intervention. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2012;38(2)68-77.
  4. Winikoff B. The effects of birth spacing on child and maternal health. Studies in Family Planning. 1983;14(10)231–245.
  5. Rutstein S. Relationships Between Pregnancy Intervals and Prenatal Mortality. Proceedings of the 2nd Champions Meeting on Birth Spacing, Washington, DC- CATALYST Consortium. 2002;15–22.
  6. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan JM. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with inter-pregnancy interval- cross sectional study. British Medical Journal. 2000;321(7271)1255- 1259.
  7. Ross AJ, Winfrey WL. Contraceptive Use, Intention to Use and Unmet Need During the Extended Postpartum Period. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2001;27(1)20–7.
  8. Sahoo H. Determinants of contraceptive use in Orissa- An analysis from National Family Health Survey III. Health and Population Perspectives and Issues. 2007;30(3)208-221.
  1. Goel S, Bhatnagar I, Khan ME, Hazra A. Increasing Postpartum Contraception in Rural Uttar Pradesh. The Journal of Family Welfare. 2010;56;57-64.
  2. Mahmood SE, Srivastava A, Shrotiya VP, Shaifali I, Mishra P. Postpartum contraceptive use in rural Bareilly. Indian Journal of community health. 2011;23(2)56-57.
  3. Singh KK, Verma S, Tanti S. Contraceptive use among postpartum women in India. Asian Population Studies. 2013.
  4. Statacorp. Stata Statistical Software- Release 10. Statacorp LP, College Station, TX. 2007.
  5. Watkins SC, Naomi R, David W. Orderly theories, disorderly women, In The Continuing Demographic Transition, (Eds) GW Jones, RM Douglas, JC Caldwell, and RM D’Souza. New York- Oxford University Press. 1997.
  6. Omondi-Odhiambo. Men’s participation in family planning decisions in Kenya. Population Studies. 1997;51(1)29–40.
  7. Stephenson R, Koenig MA, Acharya R, Roy TK. Domestic violence, contraceptive use and unwanted pregnancy in rural India. Studies in Family Planning. 2008;39(3)177–186.
  8. Bender DE, McCann MF. The influence of maternal intergenerational education on health behaviors of women in peri-urban Bolivia. Social Science & Medicine. 2000;50(9)1189–1196.
  9. Mumtaz Z, Salway S. ‘I never go anywhere’- extricating the links between women’s mobility and uptake of reproductive health services in Pakistan. Social Science & Medicine. 2005;60(8)1751–1765.