E-ISSN:2349-4166
P-ISSN:2349-4158

Research Article

Determinants

Public Health Review - International Journal of Public Health Research

2020 Volume 7 Number 2 March-April
Publisherwww.medresearch.in

Socio-demographic determinants of Iron and folic acid (IFA) consumption by females during their antenatal period delivering in a tertiary care hospital of Haryana

Vashisht B.1, Bhardwaj H.2*, Chauhan M.3, Anvesha.4, Jaiprakash.5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17511/ijphr.2020.i02.01

1 B.M. Vashisht, Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Pt. B.D. Sharma University Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

2* Himanshu Bhardwaj, Junior Resident, Department of Community Medicine, Pt. B.D. Sharma University Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

3 Meenakshi Chauhan, Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pt. B.D. Sharma University Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

4 Anvesha, Junior Resident, Department of Community Medicine, Pt. B.D. Sharma University Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

5 Jaiprakash, Junior Resident, Department of Community Medicine, Pt. B.D. Sharma University Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

Introduction: In India, the major causes of maternal mortality are hemorrhage (26%) and anemia (19%). According to NFHS -4 data, 53% of women are anemic, this situation further worsens when these anemic women come into the antenatal phase, as there is haemodilution during pregnancy. Aim and objectives: To find out the socio-demographic factors affecting Iron and Folic acid consumption among recently delivered women. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out from April 2017- April 2018 among 500 pregnant females who recently delivered at PGIMS Rohtak. A simple random sampling technique was followed. An interview schedule was used for data collection and data were analyzed using SPSS. Results: Out of 500 study subjects, the majority (70.4%) belonged to rural area.97.4% of them were Hindus, 81.4% were literate, 77.2% were unemployed, only 26.4% belonged to below poverty line. 80% of subjects were anemic and only 38.2% of study subjects consumed 100 or more IFA tablets. A significant (p≤ 0.05) association was found between IFA consumption and age, education, and occupation. Conclusion: Women and their family members need to be educated regarding the consumption of IFA tablets and their role in pregnancy.

Keywords: IFA, Anaemia, Pregnant, Socio-demographic determinants

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Himanshu Bhardwaj, Junior Resident, Department of Community Medicine, Pt. B.D. Sharma University Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Email:
Vashisht BM, Bhardwaj H, Chauhan M, Anvesha, Jaiprakash , Socio-demographic determinants of Iron and folic acid (IFA) consumption by females during their antenatal period delivering in a tertiary care hospital of Haryana. Public Health Rev Int J Public Health Res. 2020;7(2):19-25.
Available From
https://publichealth.medresearch.in/index.php/ijphr/article/view/134

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2020-04-10 2020-04-20 2020-04-24 2020-04-29
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
No Nil Yes 8%

© 2020 by B.M. Vashisht, Himanshu Bhardwaj, Meenakshi Chauhan, Anvesha, Jaiprakash and Published by Siddharth Health Research and Social Welfare Society. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Introduction

Globally 0.294 million maternal death occurred during the year 2017 [1]. About 20% of maternal deaths are directly related to anemia, and another 50% of maternal mortality is associated indirectly with anemia [2]. At present global maternal mortality ratio is 211 women per one lakh live birth [1] which is very far from the target of the sustainable development goal of achieving MMR of 70 by all the countries by 2030. In India, the current MMR is 122 [3], which is also far away from the SDG target. In India prevalence of anemia in pregnant women is 50%, which is a major contributor to maternal mortality [4]. In India, every year 4.3 lakhs live birth takes place, of which 525 maternal deaths reported [3]. The majority of maternal deaths are due to maternal factors. The major complications that account for 80% of all maternal deaths are severe bleeding/hemorrhage (mostly bleeding after childbirth), infections (usually after childbirth), high blood pressure during pregnancy (preeclampsia and eclampsia) and unsafe abortion, etc. The remaining maternal deaths are caused by or associated with diseases such as malaria and AIDS during pregnancy [5]. The major causes of maternal mortality are hemorrhage (26%) and anemia (19%). Major proportion of this could be reduced if the hemoglobin level of antenatal women is normal. In India, according to NFHS -4 data53%, women are anemic, this situation further worsens when these anemic women come into the antenatal phase, as there is haemodilution during pregnancy. Consumption of iron and folic acid (IFA) tablets during pregnancy can remarkably solve this problem. A study in Haryana has supported this fact by showing that IFA supplementation has reduced the burden of anemia from 92.9% to 79.9% in pregnant women included in the study [6]. As per guidelines of ministry of health and family welfare, the government of India under ‘Intensified National iron plus initiative program’, one IFA tablet containing 60 mg elemental iron and 0.5 mg folic acid for non-anemic women and two IFA tablets daily for anemic women for 180 days is recommended during pregnancy [7]. Different studies have shown that consumption of IFA tablets is far below recommended. According to NFHS-4 data for Haryana, only 32.5% of mothers had taken 100 IFA tablets during her pregnancy (India – 30.3%). IFA tablets are being provided free of cost during antenatal visits and checkups but even then its consumption is low. Poor compliance with IFA

tablets consumption is responsible for the prevalence of anemia in pregnant women despite supplementation [8-10]. The study was planned to find out the determinants related to IFA consumption during pregnancy.

Aim and objectives

  1. To find out the consumption of IFA tablets among recently delivered women.
  2. To study the socio-demographic factors affecting IFA consumption.

Material and methods

A cross-sectional hospital-based observational study was carried out among pregnant women who delivered at Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The study was conducted over a period of one year from April 2017 to April 2018.

Sample size: According to NFHS-4 data for Haryana, 32.5% of mothers had taken 100 IFA tablets during their pregnancy. Considering the prevalence as 32.5%, confidence interval 95 % and allowable error of 15%, the sample size was calculated using the formula

(Z1-a/2)2 X p X q

n = ----------------------------

d2

Where,

Z=standard normal variate

Z1-a/2 = value of two tailed alpha error; this is 1.96 at 5%

p = expected prevalence in fraction

q = 1 – p

d = allowable error (taken as 15%)

Minimum sample size came out to be 371. A total of 500 subjects were included in the study.

Sampling technique: 30-40 deliveries occur per day in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology PGIMS, Rohtak. So, on each day of the visit, a list of women who delivered on the previous day was prepared from the labor room register. From this list, 8-10 delivered women were selected using a simple random sampling technique using the lottery method.


Consent: Each study subject was explained about the study and informed written consent in vernacular language was taken from each of them before conducting the study. The confidentiality of the data collected was assured.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Women who delivered at PGIMS Rohtak.
  2. Women who delivered after completion of 28 weeks of gestation, irrespective of the outcome.
  3. Stillbirths were also included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Women did not give consent for the study.
  2. Women who left against medical advice (LAMA) after delivery.
  3. Women who had psychiatric illness and were severely ill.

Methodology

On the day of the visit, 8-10 delivered women were selected using a simple random sampling technique and the selected women were briefed about the nature and purpose of the study and interviewed one by one after taking their consent. A pre-designed, pre-tested, semi-structured interview schedule, which consisted of questions regarding socio-demographic profile, obstetric history, medical history, pregnancy outcome, and ANC services utilization including IFA tablets consumption, was used for recording their responses. The confidentiality of the information was maintained. For the socioeconomic status of the subjects, the revised B.G. Prasad Scale for the Year 2017 was used. The details about the utilization of antenatal care services by the subjects were enquired mainly focusing on the IFA tablet's availability and its consumption during the pregnancy.

Definitions:

Anemia during pregnancy: Refers to women with a hemoglobin level below 11 gm/dl during pregnancy

Degree of anemia:

Mild: hemoglobin level 10-10.9 gm/dl.

Moderate: haemoglobin level 7-9.9gm/dl.

Severe: hemoglobin level below 7gm/dl.

Data analysis: Collected data were compiled, coded appropriately, and entered in the MS EXCEL

spreadsheet and were cleaned for any possible typographical error. The analysis was carried out using SPSS Vs 20.0 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) and appropriate statistical tests were applied wherever applicable.

Results

Table-1: Distribution of study subjects according to their sociodemographic characteristics (n=500).

Variable Category Frequency Percentage
Age in years 18-21 111 22.2
22-25 254 50.8
26-29 66 13.2
>30 69 13.8
Area of residence Urban 148 29.6
Rural 352 70.4
Religion Hindu 487 97.4
Muslim 7 1.4
Christian 1 0.2
Sikh 5 1
Caste General 149 29.8
OBC 157 31.4
SC 188 37.6
ST 6 1.2
Family type Joint 281 56.2
Nuclear 219 43.8

Table-2: Distribution of study subjects according to their socioeconomic characteristics (n=500).

Variable Category Frequency Percentage
Education Illiterate 93 18.6
Primary 17 3.4
Middle 120 24
Secondary 178 35.6
Graduate and above 92 18.4
Occupation Unemployed 436 87.2
Unskilled 37 7.4
Semiskilled 8 1.6
Skilled 9 1.8
Semi-professional 9 1.8
Professional 1 0.2
BPL card holder Yes 132 26.4
No 368 73.4
Socioeconomic class V 14 2.8
  IV 174 34.8
  III 160 32
  II 115 23
  I 37 7.4

Out of 500 study subjects, the majority (50.8%)


belonged to the age group 22 to 25 years, followed by 18 to 21 years (22.2%), more than 30 years (13.8%), and 26 to 29 years (13.2%). The majority (70.4%) of the study population resided in urban areas while 29.6% resided in rural areas. The majority (97.4%) of subjects were Hindus followed by Muslims (1.4%), Sikhs (1%), and Christians (0.2%). The majority (37.6%) of study subjects belonged to the SC category followed by OBC (31.4%), General (29.8%), and ST category (1.2%). The majority (56.2%) of study subjects belonged to the joint family.

The majority (35.6%) of study subjects were educated up to secondary level followed by middle (24%), illiterate (18.6%), graduate and above (18.4%), and primary school level (3.4%). The majority (87.2%) of study subjects were unemployed followed by unskilled workers (7.4%), skilled and semi-professionals (1.8% each), semi-skilled (1.6%), and professionals (0.2%). The majority (34.8%) of study subjects belonged to class IV followed by class III (32%), class II (23%), class I (7.4%), and only 2.8% belonged to class V. 26.4% study subjects had BPL card.

Table- 3: Distribution of study subjects according to anemia (n=500).

Anemia Frequency Percentage
No anemia 60 12
Mild 105 21
Moderate 312 62.4
Severe 23 4.6
Total 500 100

Table -3 shows that the majority (62.4%) of study subjects suffered from moderate anemia followed by mild anemia (21%) and no anemia (12%), whereas, 4.6% had severe anemia. Hemoglobin values were available for all the study subjects as it is done in routine for all antenatal mothers.

Table- 4: Distribution of study subjects according to the consumption of IFA tablets (n=500).

IFA tablets Frequency Percentage
None 105 21.0
< 50 99 19.8
50- 100 105 21.0
>100 191 38.2
Total 500 100.0

Table 4 shows that only 38.2% of the study subjects consumed 100 or more IFA tablets. 21% of females consumed 50 -100 tablets and 19.8% of females

consumed less than 50 tablets. 21% of females did not consume any IFA tablet.

Table-5: IFA consumption and its association with the profile of study subjects (n=500).

Variable Category IFA consumption No. (%) Total Test value
Yes No
Age in years 18-21 62 (55.9) 49 (44.1) 111 χ2=11.162, p-value-0.011
22-25 137 (53.9) 117 (46.1) 254
26-29 50 (75.8) 16 (24.2) 254
>30 36 (52.2) 33 (47.8) 66
Total 285 (57) 215 (43) 500 (100)
Caste General 96 (64.4) 53 (35.6) 149 χ2=4.790, p-value-0.091
OBC 85 (54.1) 72 (45.9) 157
SC/ST 104 (53.6) 90 (46.4) 194
Education Illiterate 39 (41.9) 54 (58.1) 93 χ2=12.301, p-value-0.015
Primary 11 (64.7) 6 (35.3) 17
Middle 67 (55.8) 53 (44.2) 120
Secondary 109 (61.2) 69 (38.8) 178
Graduate and above 59 (64.1) 33 (35.9) 92
Occupation unemployed 243 (55.7) 193 (44.3) 436 χ2=11.854, p-value-0.037
Unskilled 20 (54.1) 17 (45.9) 37
Semiskilled 8 (100) 0 8
Skilled 6 (66.7) 3 (33.3) 9
Semi professional 8 (88.9) 1 (11.1) 9
Professional 0 1 (100) 1
Family type Joint 164 (58.4) 117 (41.6) 281 χ2=0.486, p-value-0.486
Nuclear 121 (55.3) 98 (44.75) 219
Socio- economic class I 6 (42.9) 8 (57.1) 14 χ2=4.428, p-value-0.351
II 92 (52.9) 82 (47.1) 174
III 92 (57.5) 68 (42.5) 160
IV 73 (63.5) 42 (36.5) 115
V 22 (59.5) 15 (40.5) 37
Religion Hindu 279 (57.3) 208 (42.7) 487 χ2=1.932, p-value-0.587
Muslim 3 (42.9) 4 (57.1) 7
Sikh 2 (40) 3 (60) 5
Christian 1 (100) 0 1

Table 5 shows the association of women who consumed and did not consume IFA tablets with their demographic profile. A significant difference was observed in terms of age, education, and


occupation of study subjects. Out of 500 study subjects, a higher proportion (75.8% and 55.9%) of IFA consumption was observed among women in the age group 26-29 and 18-21 years respectively and the results were statistically significant (p<0.05). Similarly, a higher proportion (64.7% and 64.1%) of study subjects who were educated up-to primary and graduate and above respectively showed more IFA consumption as compared to those having education up to secondary level, middle level and those who were illiterate (61.2%,55.8%and 41.9%) and the results were statistically significant(p<0.05). Similarly, a higher proportion (100% and 88.9%) of study subjects who were semiskilled, and semi-professionals showed more IFA consumption as compared to skilled, unemployed and unskilled (66.7%, 55.7%, and 54.1%) and the results were statistically significant(p<0.05). The influence of caste, family type, socio-economic status, and religion was not statistically significant (p>0.05).

Discussion

The majority (62.4%) of the present study subjects suffered from moderate anemia followed by mild anemia (21%). 12% of females did not have anemia at al, whereas 4.6% suffered from severe anemia. Similar results were found by Bora Ret al [11] who found that anemia (Hb < 11 gm/dl) was present in 89.6% mothers with 8.3% having severe anemia (Hb < 7 gm/dl). Almost similar results were found by Mishra S et al [12] who showed that the overall prevalence of anemia was 73.1%. Of these, the moderate anemia was 47.6%, mild was 43.6% and severe was 8.8%, whereas, Ahankari A et al [13] conducted a study that showed that anemia (Hb<11g/dl) was prevalent in 91% of women studied.

Devineni K et al [14] found that 45% of their subjects had medical disorders complicating pregnancy, of which severe anemia was found in 17 % of females which was a bit higher as found in the present study (4.6%). Only 38.2% of the present study subjects consumed 100 or more IFA tablets. 21% of females consumed 50 -100 tablets and 19.8% of females consumed less than 50 tablets. 21% of females did not take any IFA tablets. Iyengar S et al [15] conducted a survey that showed that iron and folic acid (IFA) tablets reached 58% of women. However, only 13% consumed IFA tablets for 90 days or more. Malik et al [16] conducted a similar study which showed that 97.4%

received 100 tablets of IFA, however, less than half of them consumed all the tablets. Abdullahi H et al [17] conducted a study on antenatal iron and folic acid supplementation use by pregnant women in Khartoum Sudan. They found that out of 856 women, 92.1% used iron-folic acid supplementation during pregnancy and 65.4% used folic acid. In the present study socio-demographic factors affecting IFA tablets consumption came out to be middle age group, educational status, and employment status. The influence of caste, family type, socio-economic status, and religion was not statistically significant.In the present study out of 500 study subjects higher proportion (75.8%) of IFA consumption was observed among women in the age group 26-29 years and the results were statistically significant (p<0.05). Similar results were shown by Mithra P et al [18] where compliance of IFA consumption was higher (72.5%) among women aged >25 years as compared to women age <25yrs.

A study by Knudsen et al[19] al also reported the same results where compliance was higher in women aged > 20 years. In the present study IFA consumption increased significantly with the increase in literacy level, it was 41.9% in illiterates and 64.1% among graduates and above. Similar findings were reported by Wendt A et al [20] in their study where IFA consumption was higher (64.9%) among women who had an education of >9 years. Similar results were shown by Knudsen et al [19] and Begum S et al [21] al who reported that consumption was higher among women with higher educational levels. In the present study IFA consumption was significantly higher among working women as compared to unemployed women. It was 55.7% among unemployed and 65.7% among working women. In a study by Chaurasia et al [22], it was seen that IFA consumption was better among non-working women. It was 18.9% among non-working and 13.4% among working women. This difference in results may be because the current study is done in one State whereas a study done by Chaurasia et al was conducted taking data from NFHS-3 of high focus states.

Limitations

The current study is a cross-sectional study so there are chances of recall bias while reporting the consumption of tablets. Also, since the study is a tertiary care setting-based study, so results cannot


be generalized for community settings.

Conclusion

A significant association was observed between age, education, and occupation of study subjects with IFA consumption. Since a higher proportion of IFA consumption was observed among women in the age group 26-29 so young and elderly pregnant women need to be focused on IFA consumption. IFA consumption was least among illiterates so women should be empowered by educating them right at the beginning by educating each and every girl child. As consumption was less among unemployed and unskilled subjects which might be due to their education status and less awareness due to less interaction with other aware people, so there should be interactive sessions/health education for them.

What does the study add to the existing knowledge

The current study showed that the education level of mother and employment status of the mother is positively related to the consumption of IFA tablets, this shows that Socioeconomic factors need to be looked upon for making policies regarding programs related to anemia in pregnancy.

Author’s contributions

Dr. B. M Vashisht: The whole concept of the study selecting a topic, the whole layout of the study, finalizing the methodology, and final proofreading of the manuscript.

Dr. Himanshu Bhardwaj: reviewed all the literature, collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data for final results.

Dr. Meenakshi: Selections of the subjects from Obstetrics and Gynecology and guidance in manuscript writing.

Dr. Anvesha: Data collection, analysis of results, final manuscript writing, and editing.

Dr. Jai Prakash: Sorting the data

Reference

  1. World Health Organization. Maternal mortality, Fact sheet – 19 Sep 2019 [Internet]. Geneva- World Health Organization. 2019.
  1. Anand T, Rahi M, Sharma P, Ingle GK. Issues in prevention of iron deficiency anemia in India. Nutri. 2014;30(7-8)764-770.
  2. Government of India. Special bulletin on maternal mortality in India [Internet], New Delhi- Office of the Registrar General. Government of India; Sample Registration System. 2019 [cited 2020 April 23]. Available from:
  3. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. National Family Health Survey-4, India Fact Sheet [Internet], International Institute of Population Sciences. Government of India. 2015-16 [Cited 2019 Dec 27]. Available at:
  4. United Nations Children Emergency Fund (UNICEF). State of world’s children report-2014 [Internet]. New York; UNICEF. 2014.
  5. Ahamed F, Yadav K, Kant S, Saxena R, Bairum M, Pandav CS. Effect of directly observed oral iron supplementation during pregnancy on iron status in a rural population in Haryana-A randomized controlled trial. Indian J Public Health. 2018;62(4)287-293. Available from:
  6. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Guidelines for Control of Anaemia- Intensified National Iron Plus Initiative. New Delhi, Government of India. 2018.
  7. Habib F, Alabdin EH, Alenazy M, Nooh R. Compliance to iron supplementation during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29(6)487-492.
  8. Lacerte P, Pradipasen M, Temcharoen P, Imamee N, Vorapongsathorn T. Determinants of adherence to Iron/Folate supplementation during pregnancy in two provinces in Cambodia. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2011;23(3)315-323.
  9. Yip R. Iron supplementation- Country level experiences and lessons learned. J Nutr. 2002;132(4)859S-861S.

  1. Bora R, Sable C, Wolfson J, Boro K, Rao R. Prevalence of anemia in pregnant women and its effect on neonatal outcomes in Northeast India. J Mat Fet Neonat Med. 2013;27(9)887-891.
  2. Mishra S, Gupta P, Bhardwaj P, Sachan B, Srivastav J, Mishra A. effect of antenatal services during pregnancy on prevalence of anemia amongst pregnant women in Lucknow. Indian J Med Sci. 2016;68(1)17.
  3. Ahankari A, Bapat S, Myles P, Fogarty A, Tata L. Factors associated with preterm delivery and low birth weight- a study from rural Maharashtra, India. F1000 Res. 2017;6;72.
  4. Devineni K, Sodumu N. A study of spectrum of referral pattern at a tertiary teaching hospital towards better obstetric care. IAIM. 2016;3(8)193-198.
  5. Iyengar S, Iyengar K, Gupta V. Maternal Health- A Case Study of Rajasthan. J Health, Population Nutri. 2009;27(2)271-292.
  6. Malik JS, Kalhan M, Punia A, Sachdeva S, Behera BK. Utilization of Health Services under Janani Suraksha Yojna in Rural Haryana. Int J Med Public Health. 2013;3(3)176-179.
  7. Abdullahi H, Gasim G, Saeed A, Imam A, Adam I. Antenatal iron and folic acid supplementation use by pregnant women in Khartoum, Sudan. BMC Research Notes. 2014;7(1):498.
  1. Mithra P, Unnikrishan B, Rekha T, Nithin K, Mohan K, Kulkarni V, et al. Compliance with iron-folic acid (IFA) therapy among pregnant women in an urban area of south India. Afr Health Sci. 2013;13(4)880-885.
  2. Knudsen VK, Hansen HS, Ovesen L, Mikkelsen TB, Olsen SF. Iron supplement use among Danish pregnant women. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10(10)1104-1110.
  3. Wendt A, Stephenson R, Young M, Webb Girard A, Hogue C, Ramakrishnan U, et al. Individual and Facility-Level Determinants of Iron and Folic Acid Receipt and Adequate Consumption among Pregnant Women in Rural Bihar, India. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3)e0120404.
  4. Begum S. Factors associated with adherence to iron folic acid supplementations during pregnancy in Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Mater Child Health. 2012;14(2)2-9.
  5. Ankita C, Chandra P, Ashish A. Factors influencing the consumption of iron and folic acid supplementations in high focus states of India. Clin Epidemiol and Glob Health. 2017;5(4)180-184.