A cross sectional study to assess the socio-economic impact of falls in an urban community in South India
Abstract
Background: Epidemiological transition have resulted the injuries to emerge as a global public health problem. Falls are one of the leading causes of injuries and has been predicted that it will be top 20 leading cause of death by 2030. Very few studies have been conducted about falls in all age groups. Hence the present study focussed on the prevalence of falls in an urban area, Bangalore and its social and economic impact on the individual and their family.
Materials and Methods: Cross sectional study was conducted covering 3003 population by house-house survey. Pre-tested, semi-structured questionnaire was used. Among injured by falls further details was obtained.
Results: Prevalence of falls was 23/1000 population; 95% CI (18-29). High prevalence was seen among extremes of age group and among males. Home was the common place of falls. Lower limb was common injury site and fracture was seen in 16.4% cases. Even after one month of injury, disability persisted in 31.5% cases. Hospital charges were high for elderly people (P=0.04). Total cost incurred following falls was high among 15-59 year age group (P=0.005).
Conclusions: Prevalence of falls was 23/1000 population; 95% CI (18-29). Social impact in terms of disability lasting even after one month following falls was present in 31.5%, most common being limping. Though the prevalence of falls was high among extremes of age group, overall economic impact following falls was high among 15-60 year age group.
Downloads
References
2. WHO. Injuries [Online]. 2016 [cited 2016 May 31]; Available from: URLhttp://www.who.int/topics/injuries/about/en/
3. Falls [Online]. 2012 [cited 2016 May 31]. Available from: URL http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs344/en/
4. National Crime Records Bureau. Accidental deaths and suicides in India. New Delhi: NCRB; 2014.
5. Pressley J, Barlow B. Child and adolescent injury as a result of falls from buildings and structures. Injury Prevention [serial online] 2005 [cited 2016 June 2]; 11(5):267-273. Available from: URLhttp://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/11/5/267.full.pdf+html
6. C. Vani, Suryanarayana S, Nandakumar B, Murthy N. A cross sectional study of pattern of injuries and its socio-economic impact in an urban area, Bangalore. Int J Community Med Public Health [serial online] 2016 [cited 2016 May 31]; 3(2):419-425. Available from: URL http://www.scopemed.org/fulltextpdf.php?mno=216494
7. McGee K, Sethi D, Peden M, Habibula S. Guidelines for conducting community surveys on injuries and violence. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2004 Dec;11(4):303-6.
8. Kumar N, Gupta N, Kishore J. Kuppuswamy’s socioeconomic scale: updating income ranges for the year 2012. Indian J Public Health. 2012;56(1):103-4
9. NIMHANS – BISP Fact sheet on Injury among children 2007. Bengaluru: NIMHANS; 2007
10. WHO. 10 facts on injuries to children. [Online]. 2016 [cited 2016 May 31]; Available from: URL http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/injuries_children/facts/en/index5.html
11. Jagnoor J, Suraweera W, Keay L, Ivers R, Thakur J, Gururaj G et al. Childhood and adult mortality from unintentional falls in India. Bulletin of the World Health Organization [serial online] 2011 [cited 2016 June 2]; 89(10):733-740. Available from: URLhttp://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/89/10/11-086306/en/
12. Stevens J, Corso P, Finkelstein E, Miller T. The costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults. Injury Prevention [serial online] 2006 [cited 2016 June 3]; 12(5):290-295. Available from: URLhttp://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/12/5/290.full.pdf+html
Copyright (c) 2016 Author (s). Published by Siddharth Health Research and Social Welfare Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
OAI - Open Archives Initiative
